Web lists-archives.com

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] three.js_80+dfsg2-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Pirate Praveen wrote:

> > I'm lost already, sorry. As I understand the case of three.js's recent
> > rejection, no other ftp-master said anything and thus there cannot be
> > any dissention.
> I think it would be better if that is made explicit else how many days
> should someone wait to see no response and assume no dissent? or is to
> be always assumed there won't be any dissent?

Apologies, but this reads like another non-sequitur to me. Why would deciding
on a number of days before one can assume _no_ dissent make any difference at
all to the case of three.js given that you are claiming there _is_ dissent?

Best wishes,

     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@xxxxxxxxxx / chris-lamb.co.uk