Web lists-archives.com

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] three.js_80+dfsg2-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

[adding -devel]

On ഞായര്‍ 25 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2018 03:01 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Does other ftp masters agree with this assessment of considering the
> size of the package as the only criteria to accept or reject a package?
> I don't agree with forcing other contributors to do extra, non standard,
> hacks instead of following the standards were applicable.
> node-three is the standard way for every node tools including webpack to
> find this package. Having to replicate this structure for every
> depending package is not acceptable.
> I have not objected to every rejection, where it made sense I have
> already embedded some modules (is-svg, unique-slug for example, and
> switching to a embed first and package on second dependency approach in
> general), but I don't agree with this case.

It seems ftp masters are literally the masters with only a GR powerful
enough to over turn their decisions. See

I do not think this is really in sync with the rest of debian
philosophy. I think the following steps would improve the situation.

1. If a single ftp master is in disagreement, there should be a team
decision (in previous cases of disagreement also, other team members did
not get involved).
2. CTTE should be able to overrule a delegate when there is a conflict
just like conflict between two debian developers.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature