Web lists-archives.com

Re: Debian part of a version number when epoch is bumped

On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 13:31 +0000, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:06:00PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > This is one of the many situations where I'd like developers to *ask*
> > when unsure or uncertain of something.
> > So, in fact, the epoch bump was totally useless, and as it often happens
> > in those cases, it's causing headaches for somebody.
> Maybe introducing epochs should force a round-trip through NEW...

That would completely ruin my plan to only ever release version 1.0 of
all of my future projects, but increase the epoch instead.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part