Web lists-archives.com

Re: Removing packages perhaps too aggressively?




On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 06:04:42PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> We don't need yet another process, if you want to get rid of a package
> you can open an RFA bug or orphan it

Orphaned packages tend to be maintained better than many of those which have
an alleged maintainer.  The O status shouldn't be taken as a step towards
removal.

Conversely, an active maintainer may have doubts wrt h{is,er} work is
actually of benefit to anyone.

> and/or open an rc bug

This sounds like an abuse to me.


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ The bill with 3 years prison for mentioning Polish concentration
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ camps is back.  What about KL Warschau (operating until 1956)?
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Zgoda?  Łambinowice?  Most ex-German KLs?  If those were "soviet
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ puppets", Bereza Kartuska?  Sikorski's camps in UK (thanks Brits!)?