Re: Removing packages perhaps too aggressively?
- Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 13:48:52 -0500
- From: Michael Stone <mstone@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Removing packages perhaps too aggressively?
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 06:39:32PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Typically a removed package is not in a much worse shape when it got
removed compared to when it was first shipped in a stable release.
At that point the actual question is why we did allow the package
to be ITP'ed into Debian at all.
Well, in a lot of cases better alternatives have come along, or it
wasn't originally clear which alternatives would live and which would
wither away. And we've all learned a lot more about secure coding in the
past 20 years.
I do wish it was easier for users to find out why a package was removed,
and that it was more common for the removal log to list alternatives.