Bug#886238: Please introduce official nosystemd build profile
- Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 16:13:10 +0100
- From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Bug#886238: Please introduce official nosystemd build profile
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 09:13:24AM -0500, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> Conversely, if the patches are invasive and unmaintainable, its not on Debian
> to merge them.
Yes. But adding a "nosystemd" build profile is in no way "invasive and
(why the top-post?)
> On Jan 3, 2018 9:09 AM, "Wouter Verhelst" <wouter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 01:59:05PM +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On 3 January 2018 at 13:12, Hleb Valoshka <375gnu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Package: general
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > >
> > > Please introduce official nosystemd build profile so downstream
> > > distributions can send patches to package maintainers with
> > > systemd-less build instead of keep them in home.
> > Do we really need systemd-less builds? I'm not convinced this is
> > something relevant to Debian.
> We don't *need* them, but it's not a problem if people want to support
> it. Debian has always allowed things to be defined by those that want to
> do the work.
> If adding an official "nosystemd" build profile makes life easier for
> people who want to support systemd-less builds, and they send patches to
> keep the build profile actually working, then that doesn't hurt us in
> any way and I think we should do it.
> Could you people please use IRC like normal people?!?
> -- Amaya Rodrigo Sastre, trying to quiet down the buzz in the DebConf
Could you people please use IRC like normal people?!?
-- Amaya Rodrigo Sastre, trying to quiet down the buzz in the DebConf 2008