Web lists-archives.com

Re: Exclicitly or "implicitly" mark architectures a packages does not build

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 03:31:33PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 04:10:09PM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
> > but isn't this something that can be detected automatically?
> > e.g. if <<package>> on <<arch>> is not available in unstable and/or
> > testing, exclude it from the rebuilds.
> besides that it's not that easy (eg a package might not yet be available
> there…) this also and mostly affects arch:all binary packages.

I can confirm that it also affects arch:all packages.  But why shouldn't
it be possible to detect this automatically also in this case?

Kind regards