Web lists-archives.com

Re: Exclicitly or "implicitly" mark architectures a packages does not build

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 04:10:09PM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
> but isn't this something that can be detected automatically?
> e.g. if <<package>> on <<arch>> is not available in unstable and/or
> testing, exclude it from the rebuilds.
besides that it's not that easy (eg a package might not yet be available
there…) this also and mostly affects arch:all binary packages.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature