Re: RFH: citadel/webcit
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:37:40 -0500
- From: "Robert J. Clay" <rjclay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: RFH: citadel/webcit
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Michael Meskes <meskes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> If not I'm going to have it removed I guess.
>> I'd be against that.
> Me too, but somebody has to be able to put some time into it. :)
>> I have a Jessie installed system that I can't update to Stretch
>> because citadel won't run on it yet; and the Citadel install there
>> one of the primary reasons I'm running that system. (And I prefer to
>> use Debian for my systems, and 'official' packages when possible.)
> What's the problem? I'm not aware of any grave bug on Stretch, but may
> have missed it.
Well, perhaps not "grave" and I have perhaps gotten overly focused
on wanting to test out newer versions but there is also the
'important' bug #862296, although I do think I'd found a
work-around for the issue.
>> There used to be a team maintaining these packages,
>> > but I'm the only one who worked on it in recent years.
>> I've wondered about that...
>> I'm a DM (as jame@xxxxxxxxx) not a DD, so there are some things I
>> can't do directly. I am very interested in helping how I can with
>> the Citadel packages.
> If you're interested, how about becoming a member of the team?
Actually, I'm already listed as a member... (Robert Clay, 'jame-guest')
Robert J. Clay