Web lists-archives.com

Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:00:49PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 02:18:46PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > is there any good reason for the recommends of apparmor in the latest
> > linux packages?
> This is in response to a discussion that happened on this list. The
> thread started in august last year[1], but really picked up speed last
> month[2] and this one[3].
> The idea is that, if no critical issues are found, buster would release
> with AppArmor enabled by default. If critical issues are found, however,
> I expect the decision will be reversed (or at the least, postponed).
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/08/msg00090.html
> [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/10/threads.html#00086
> [3] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/11/threads.html#00000

This doesn't strike me as a discussion, but looks more like a predetermined setup.