Web lists-archives.com

Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:01:09PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> That's still not an upstream default lsm.  Looks like someone in
> Debian just decided to make apparmor the default, which is horrible
> news :(

Hello, Christoph,

do you think you could manage to either point the general -devel
reading population to a discussion of why using AppArmor by default is
horrible news, or write that yourself? That would seem to be more
constructive than you just showing up after months of discussion
saying it's horrible news.

(If you need to, I can lend you my time machine so you can send the
explantion last year and we can avoid escalating things to the current

I want to build worthwhile things that might last. --joeyh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature