Web lists-archives.com

Re: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive


On Tue, Nov 21 2017, Russ Allbery wrote:

> Policy in this case would document the convention of using -offensive
> for packages that are split along those lines *by the maintainer*.  I
> agree that we certainly shouldn't attempt to define what is and isn't
> offensive in Policy and leave that up to the maintainer.  But it
> sounds like we have a package naming convention for this specific type
> of package split, and the standardization of the naming convention
> (-offensive instead of -off or -dirty or -nsfw or whatever other thing
> someone might come up with) is within the traditional grounds of
> Policy.

This is what I meant.  Apologies for my brevity.

Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature