Web lists-archives.com

Re: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive

On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 21:29 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > In my honest opinion, rating certain content types within a package should
> > be
> > done along the lines of PEGI[1]. A self regulatory rating done as part of a
> > social policy and administered by the particular packages maintainer. All
> > subsequent questioning of rating would be done via bug reports against the
> > particular package.
> Some rating related resources are at:
> https://wiki.debian.org/OpenRating
> > * Rating set within debian folder - maybe rating file.
> Personally I think a debtags/screenshots style service would be better here.
> > * Seen on packages.d.o, PTS and query by apt etc. for package.
> > * Should not be auto installed as a recommends etc.
> Preferably configurable, perhaps by installing packages with standard names.


Thanks for the link Paul.

The Open Rating debtags idea I find far more appealing than package naming with
the offensive or other suffix.



*** If this is a mailing list, I am subscribed, no need to CC me.***

Playing the game for the games sake.

Web: https://kathenas.org

GitLab: https://gitlab.com/kathenas

Twitter: kathenasorg

Instagram: kathenasorg

GPG: 1B97 6556 913F 73F3 9C9B 25C4 2961 D9B6 2017 A57A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part