Web lists-archives.com

Re: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive




Am 22.11.2017 um 14:29 schrieb Paul Wise:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Phil Wyett wrote:
> 
>> In my honest opinion, rating certain content types within a package should be
>> done along the lines of PEGI[1]. A self regulatory rating done as part of a
>> social policy and administered by the particular packages maintainer. All
>> subsequent questioning of rating would be done via bug reports against the
>> particular package.
> 
> Some rating related resources are at:
> 
> https://wiki.debian.org/OpenRating
> 
>> * Rating set within debian folder - maybe rating file.
> 
> Personally I think a debtags/screenshots style service would be better here.

I agree. Using the package name for labelling feels odd.

-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature