Web lists-archives.com

Re: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive




On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Phil Wyett wrote:

> In my honest opinion, rating certain content types within a package should be
> done along the lines of PEGI[1]. A self regulatory rating done as part of a
> social policy and administered by the particular packages maintainer. All
> subsequent questioning of rating would be done via bug reports against the
> particular package.

Some rating related resources are at:

https://wiki.debian.org/OpenRating

> * Rating set within debian folder - maybe rating file.

Personally I think a debtags/screenshots style service would be better here.

> * Seen on packages.d.o, PTS and query by apt etc. for package.
> * Should not be auto installed as a recommends etc.

Preferably configurable, perhaps by installing packages with standard names.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise