Web lists-archives.com

Re: Anyone using stretch/buster/sid on ARMv4t ?

On 2017-11-07 11:08, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Keeping armel on life support for 2 more
> years is a significant drain on DSA and our hosters, for questionable
> benefit.

I agree, that this support comes not for free, but the benefit
is not questionable to me: There is still relevant hardware
around which can run "armel", but not "armhf". *If* there are
enough developers and build machines, there is no reason to drop
the architecture prematurely. I can't see any relevance for
ARMv4t anymore, however.