Re: New package, name recycling
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 02:20:07 +0200
- From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: New package, name recycling
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 11:02:31PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> FAOD: although "." is legal in package names, I agree that it should
> not be used here. We don't want to embed upstream's domain names in
> our package names because the former have a very short lifespan (!)
> - often much shorter than the lifespan of a Debian package.
Yeah, it's a terrible idea. But there's something nasty I can tell you
about what appears to be a set of packages implementing golang's interfaces
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Laws we want back: Poland, Dz.U. 1921 nr.30 poz.177 (also Dz.U.
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 1920 nr.11 poz.61): Art.2: An official, guilty of accepting a gift
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ or another material benefit, or a promise thereof, [in matters
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ relevant to duties], shall be punished by death by shooting.