Re: New package, name recycling
- Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:40:39 +0200
- From: Michael Biebl <biebl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: New package, name recycling
Am 21.10.2017 um 11:45 schrieb Christoph Biedl: > Or: Introduce package namespaces, this is a big change. The existing > flat model one with somewhat hundred thousand (wild guess) entries over > the past 25 years worked quite well most of the time, although not > always (git, node). But it's obvious there is a problem in the very long > run, and it seems wise to think about that before it becomes pressing. > For a start, there is the Section: information, then a sound/dino and a > net/dino could co-exist. While that would solve the infrastructure (bts, pts,...) and package management side, it's still very likely that you'd get file conflicts like both shipping /usr/bin/dino -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
Description: OpenPGP digital signature