Web lists-archives.com

Re: s/python3-sphinx-intl/sphinx-intl




On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:54:15 -0300
Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > if sphinx-intl is primary application (cli tool, etc.), than binary pkg
> > > sphinx-intl is better. If it's library/module, than python3-sphinx-intl
> > > is better.
> > 
> > Based on the description of the project [1], it looks like it is the former.
> > 
> > [1] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sphinx-intl
> 
> however sphinx itself is python*-sphinx, so maybe having those be
> consistent with each other is a good idea.

 Hmm. We don't have python-sphinx-intl for python2.x, so maybe just
 sphinx-intl is okay for users.


-- 
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane     henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
 http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane