Web lists-archives.com

Re: Let's enable AppArmor by default (why not?)




I have Ubuntu running on another box. I haven't had any trouble (to my knowledge) that has been caused from apparmor. Ubuntu being perceived as an entry OS for linux, I would think Canonical wouldn't have included it if it would introduce pain to desktop users. What sort of "pain" might apparmor cause?

I assumed apparmor was also on debian. If it isn't, doesn't this make Ubuntu significantly more secure than a debian installation?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy Bicha" <jbicha@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Ritesh Raj Sarraf" <rrs@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: debian-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 9:11:32 AM
Subject: Re: Let's enable AppArmor by default (why not?)

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But for desktop users, I worry this would cause more pain.

My point is that it hasn't so far and Ubuntu and SUSE has had millions
of people using it for a decade, more or less.

Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha