Re: Let's enable AppArmor by default (why not?)
- Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 13:22:23 +0000 (GMT)
- From: "Garrett R." <grtrbsn83@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Let's enable AppArmor by default (why not?)
I have Ubuntu running on another box. I haven't had any trouble (to my knowledge) that has been caused from apparmor. Ubuntu being perceived as an entry OS for linux, I would think Canonical wouldn't have included it if it would introduce pain to desktop users. What sort of "pain" might apparmor cause?
I assumed apparmor was also on debian. If it isn't, doesn't this make Ubuntu significantly more secure than a debian installation?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy Bicha" <jbicha@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Ritesh Raj Sarraf" <rrs@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 9:11:32 AM
Subject: Re: Let's enable AppArmor by default (why not?)
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But for desktop users, I worry this would cause more pain.
My point is that it hasn't so far and Ubuntu and SUSE has had millions
of people using it for a decade, more or less.