Web lists-archives.com

Re: Embedded library copies - mergerfs




On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 10:32 +0200, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Aug 07 2017, Ben Finney <bignose@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > By your description, the upstream code doesn't do that. One obvious
> > workaround is to remove the embedded library in the Debian
> > ‘mergerfs’
> > package ‘clean’ target, patch the software to instead use Debian's
> > packaged ‘libfuse’ library, and maintain that patch in the Debian
> > ‘mergerfs’ package, indefinitely.
> > 
> > There may be some upstream changes that you could suggest which
> > would
> > make that easier. Could a bit of refactoring in ‘mergerfs’ allow
> > for an
> > easily configurable ‘libfuse’ location? Could those changes be made
> > acceptable by the upstream developer?
> 
> libfuse upstream here. I am not aware of any open (non documentation-
> )
> bugs reported by mergefs people. So by that criterion mergefs should
> work just fine with the packaged libfuse.

Thanks for mentioning that. I'll mention this to upstream folks for
mergerfs.

Ritesh

-- 
Given the large number of mailing lists I follow, I request you to CC
me in replies for quicker response

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part