Web lists-archives.com

Re: P.S. Re: Debian 9 in a VM with Proxmox 5 system




Am 12.07.2017 um 20:40 schrieb Roger Lynn:
> On 10/07/17 19:40, Marvin Renich wrote:
> 
> <snip lots of good arguments>
> 
>> There is an easy fix to revert the default behavior while still allowing
>> knowledgeable sysadmins to get the new behavior.  On the other hand,
>> those who need to administer systems but are not sysadmins by trade (and
>> thus will have to do significantly more research to even know that the
>> older behavior is possible) are the ones who need the older behavior as
>> the default.
> 
> This caught me out on a recent new installation, which gave me these new
> names which are too complicated to be usable. I wasted hours working out
> what had happened, how to fix it and how to write a udev rules file from
> scratch. And having just read this thread, I've discovered that the rules
> I've written are themselves apparently unreliable, for example:
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ATTR{address}=="1c:1b:0d:9a:34:98", NAME="eth0"
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ATTR{address}=="1c:1b:0d:9a:34:9a", NAME="eth1"

As mentioned elsewhere, such rules are unreliable indeed as they use the
same names as the kernel. You should a different namespace.

-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature