Web lists-archives.com

Re: Intended MBF: maintainer scripts not using strict mode




On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 09:03:16AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:09:26PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:23:56PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > > we currently have in sid 84 maintainer scripts not using strict mode.
> > > That is, they neither start on "#!/bin/[ba]sh -e", nor do a "set -e".
> > > The list is attached. This list includes the 12 remaining scripts not
> > > starting on #! (bugs are already filed for these).

> > sigh.
> > And using `#!/bin(ba)?sh -e` is not good either (there is a lintian tag
> > about it, iirc).

> what is the rationale for this? Is anyone calling maintainer scripts
> like "sh <script>" ?

More typically, 'sh -x <script>' for debugging and you don't want the
behavior to change except the -x.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@xxxxxxxxxx                                     vorlon@xxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature