Web lists-archives.com

Re: aren't unreliable tests worse than none? (Re: Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly)

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:29:28AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The point is that they don't randomly fail in the sense that they don't
> fail n% of the time when run in any possible build environment.

…but point taken, not all FTBFS bugs are RC(!) as
<20170220152410.3mkm5tebg5i2ympa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> nicely
explained and whose explainations where mostly ignored by Santiago in his


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature