Web lists-archives.com

Re: aren't unreliable tests worse than none? (Re: Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly)




On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:29:28AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> This is, in a sense, an unreliable test, but it's not unreliable in a way
> that directly affects the main line of package development.
 
until someone affected wants to contribute…


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature