Re: Is our use of Cygwin to build & run OpenOCD a good one?
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 19:53:59 +0200
- From: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Is our use of Cygwin to build & run OpenOCD a good one?
Bob Cochran writes:
> We recently wrote up our process on building OpenOCD using Cygwin on
> Windows 10 and shared it on the OpenOCD mail list. And, I received
> the following feedback:
> "Cygwin? this is probably still functional, but now can be considered
> a (pre)historic solution."
More likely a fossilized memory of a very old Cygwin by that commenter.
> I personally have been using Cygwin for many years and have come to
> trust it for interfacing to Linux and macOS boxes from Windows. I
> think it's a great project, so when I wanted to build & run OpenOCD
> from scratch, I naturally went to Cygwin.
> I would appreciate any feedback on our use of Cygwin for building &
> running OpenOCD: https://mindchasers.com/dev/openocd-darsena-windows
> If fellow Cygwin users think it's a poor use case, then we'll pull the
It works, you don't have to jump through burning hoops to get there and
it helps you out for when you have to use a Windows box. So, all around
a good use-case, really.
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
SD adaptation for Waldorf Blofeld V1.15B11:
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple