Web lists-archives.com

Re: Is our use of Cygwin to build & run OpenOCD a good one?

Erik Soderquist, on Monday, May 20, 2019 10:16 AM, wrote...
>On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 3:44 PM Bob Cochran wrote:
>> "Cygwin? this is probably still functional, but now can be considered a
>> (pre)historic solution."
>The words of the ignorant, in my opinion.  Cygwin has done an
>excellent job of maintaining currency and usefulness.

Indeed.  I have been using cygwin since 1996-7.  Can't remember the exact year, but it has been God-sent, and it has been in every Windows machine I have had control.  Just my 0.02. Thanks.


Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple