Re: Is our use of Cygwin to build & run OpenOCD a good one?
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 10:16:37 -0400
- From: Erik Soderquist <erik.soderquist@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Is our use of Cygwin to build & run OpenOCD a good one?
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 3:44 PM Bob Cochran wrote:
> "Cygwin? this is probably still functional, but now can be considered a
> (pre)historic solution."
The words of the ignorant, in my opinion. Cygwin has done an
excellent job of maintaining currency and usefulness.
> I would appreciate any feedback on our use of Cygwin for building &
> running OpenOCD: https://mindchasers.com/dev/openocd-darsena-windows
I think the most important key question to ask is: does it work well
for you and your use case?
> If fellow Cygwin users think it's a poor use case, then we'll pull the
If it works well, I think it is a good use case.
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple