Web lists-archives.com

Re: Cygwin fails to utilize Unicode replacement character




On 4. 9. 2018 16:18, Thomas Wolff wrote:
My vote is against the patch because the nodef glyph will often be just blank space which is certainly worse than ▒.

How often is "often"?  Do the default Windows fonts have okay nodef glyphs?

By the way, how does this work with OEM fonts?

--
David Macek

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature