Web lists-archives.com

Re: Incorrect /proc/cpuinfo for AMD A6-9220




On Apr 13 20:36, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:51 AM, Corinna Vinschen
> <corinna-cygwin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Apr 12 23:01, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> >> Hi Everyone,
> >>
> >> I'm working on an AMD A6-9220 and seeing unusual results from
> >> /proc/cpuinfo. I think this may be an issue with the latest Cygwin. It
> >> may be present in earlier versions, too.
> >>
> >> Russinovich's coreinfo is shown below
> >> (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/coreinfo).
> >> Notice /proc/cpuinfo is missing aesni, pclmul, rdrand, SSE4.1, SSE4.2,
> >> AVX, etc.
> >
> > Note that, in theory, cpuinfo has to be extended for each new CPU
> > generation.  That's a lot of work for marginal gain (Cygwin's not a real
> > kernel) so I'm doing this only very seldomly.
> >
> > Patches welcome, of course!
> 
> Thanks Corinna. I think I found the file of interest at fhandler_proc.cc.
> 
> Whitespace is a bit off. It is a mix of tabs and space:
> 
>       if (features1 & (1 << 0))
>     print (" fpu");
>       if (features1 & (1 << 1))
>     print (" vme");
> 
> Should I perform a whitespace check-in before things begin? Or can you
> knock it out?

Whitespacing looks correct to me.  In vim speak, ts=8, sw=2.

Just add what you think is missing (make sure it matches AMD/Intel),
but stick to the whitespacing of the existing code.  Please check
https://cygwin.com/contrib.html.


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature