Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 16:46:43 +0200
- From: Marco Atzeri <marco.atzeri@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-
On 19/10/2017 15:25, cyg Simple wrote:
On 10/18/2017 7:26 PM, Steven Penny wrote:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:45:11, Marco Atzeri wrote:
For a regex pattern you should include both.
I do not bore which one is built and distributed on my packages.
E.G. on octave
This is certainly not right. I can understand that we will have some
discrepancies across packages, but having a different vendor in the same
is unacceptable. It suggests that x86_64-unknown-cygwin and i686-pc-cygwin
differ in more ways that one, which they dont. you let it slide, then
I can live with the historical i*-pc-cygwin mishap.
- where is x86_64-pc-cygwin?
This I cannot live with and the package maintainers need to target
x86_64-unknown-cygwin instead. GCC has a target build of
x86_64-pc-cygwin, it needs corrected!
It seems all cygwin package maintainers have no problem.
So are you causing yourself a not-existing problem ?
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple