Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-
- Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
- From: Steven Penny <svnpenn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:45:11, Marco Atzeri wrote:
For a regex pattern you should include both.
I do not bore which one is built and distributed on my packages.
E.G. on octave
This is certainly not right. I can understand that we will have some
discrepancies across packages, but having a different vendor in the same package
is unacceptable. It suggests that x86_64-unknown-cygwin and i686-pc-cygwin
differ in more ways that one, which they dont. you let it slide, then people
- where is x86_64-pc-cygwin?
- where is i686-unknown-cygwin?
which are both valid questions when a package maintainer does dumb stuff like
this. just realized that for octave package, that is you:
point still stands
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple