Web lists-archives.com

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-




On 2017-10-18 00:45, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> On 18/10/2017 05:29, cyg Simple wrote:
>> On 10/17/2017 7:49 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
>>> On 2017-10-17 13:16, cyg Simple wrote:
>> I'm only concerned with Cygwin at the moment.  As I understand it the we
>> should distribute x86[_64]-unknown-cygwin-*.exe and not as
>> x86[_64]-pc-cygwin-*.exe  We also need to correct config.guess for the
>> i*:CYGWIN*:* match.
> it is irrelevant as x86[_64]-unknown-cygwin-*.exe and
> x86[_64]-pc-cygwin-*.exe are equivalent.
> And usually it is not x86 but i686
>  $ arch
> i686
> For a regex pattern you should include both.
> I do not care which one is built and distributed on my packages.
> E.G. on octave
> /usr/lib/octave/site/oct/i686-pc-cygwin
> /usr/lib/octave/site/oct/x86_64-unknown-cygwin

Do gcc... and binutils have to match so the front end can find the build tools
or are there config options for binutils triplet or vendor?

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple