Re: Signal delivered while blocked
- Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 14:18:45 +0200
- From: Houder <houder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Signal delivered while blocked
On 2017-08-19 10:01, Noah Misch wrote:
What words in those chapters prompted your conclusion? I see nothing
or 20.13 about contextual restrictions on SIG_SETMASK. Posix mentions
restrictions in its sigprocmask() page, and Posix does say:
My apologies! My command over the English language is poor. English is
my native tongue, and I have hard time getting my point across in
I am not a language genius.
Let me try again with regard to the most important thing.
Keep in mind, that I replied to your post after I had executed your code
Linux (and had a hard look at your code).
I was astonished to see the 'run-away' stack on Linux ...
("that cannot be correct", was my thinking)
I should have written in my previous reply:
"you cannot make use of SIG_SETMASK in sigprocmask() within the
of a handler", IN THE WAY YOU DO IT"
"in the body of a signal handler, one cannot modify the signal mask
knowing what it was at the beginning"
1. when a signal handler is entered, the kernel will (usually) have
the signal number, associated to the handler, to the mask
2. the execution of a handler may be nested within the execution of
Consequently, one does not know what the signal mask is at the beginning
the critical section in the handler.
That is why you want to save the current signal mask when modifying it
the start of the critical section).
At the end of the critical section, one should restore the old signal
or test it in case one want to revert the signal mask "by hand".
Take a look at listing 20-5 in LPI.
And yes, the above should be present in a text book about U/Linux (and
it is not explicitly stated in LPI).
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple