Web lists-archives.com

Re: "rebase-trigger full"




On 25/07/2017 15:29, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 25/07/2017 16:12, mike wrote:
On 25/07/2017 11:17, mike wrote:
On 25/07/2017 06:21, Brian Inglis wrote:

Thanks very much for that Brian.  That seems to have done the trick.
It's solved part of my problems anyway.  However why does rebasing take
such a long time?  I would have thought that it would be quite fast
using oldschool compile/link/load techniques. I'm not being critical I'm
just curious because a long time ago I used to work on stuff like this
myself.


Hi Mike,

"full" take long as need to rebase from scratch every single dll's.
It is only needed in case of problems.

If you want to know how many dll's are rebased :

$ rebase -si |wc -l


The usual rebase pass is incremental and it is much faster.

Regards
Marco


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple


Thank you Marco.  Maybe there are just way more dlls than I ever realised.

Mike

--
I *AM* a unique and special snowflake


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple