Re: TIOCSTI or workaround?
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:51:48 +0200
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: TIOCSTI or workaround?
On Jun 25 21:04, Greywolf wrote: > On 2017-06-25 20:58, Greywolf wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I have a program I've writ which takes input and types on to other > > terminals; however, it seems that under Cygwin, TIOCSTI on a file > > descriptor doesn't work according to plan -- I get "Invalid argument", > > but I don't know why. > > > > Did a read on ioctl, and saw something about POSIX STREAMS. I thought > > that paradigm had died a mean nasty ugly death YEARS back, but I'm > > hoping that's entirely beside the point. > > > > Does there exist a way to successfully call > > > > ioctl(fd, TIOCSTI, (char *)cp) > > > > or is there a workaround? > > Addendum: > > I used the "standard" TIOCSTI definition of: > > #define TIOCSTI 0x5214 That can't work. ioctl codes are platform specific. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Description: PGP signature